'Compare and contrast of feudal systems in Japan and Europe Essay\r'

'japanese feudal carcass during the Kamakaru one-man rule from 1100 to 1868 and atomic number 63’s feudal system during the middle ages from the 800’s to the 1600’s were exchange equal to(p) regarding warriors and weapons, considering that they were found on quasi(prenominal) codes of shell out and weaponry, were equal in their socio- policy-making division that had a akin hereditary hierarchy, but the treatment of women differed in that women were allowed to serve in Japanese warrior manakin but non in the atomic number 63an’s. European knights were very connatural to the Japanese samurais; not only were they similar in their codes of conduct, but they had similar weaponry. The Knights were based on Chivalry which consisted bravery, respect and honor. The Samurais followed a similar code of conduct called bushido heart â€Å"the way of the warrior” which consisted of loyalty, bravery in the military arts, and honor until death. The si milarity in their weapons was the intention of swords, horses, small knifes, and accouterments. Although Europeans had a much heavier arms made of metal which immobilized knights, Japanese outfit can still be compared to the armor of the knights.\r\nReasons for this similarity is that two systems were faced with unalterable war, and their conducts were somewhat based on religion although Japan basing bushido from Confucianism and Europe basing chivalry from Catholicism. The socio political divisions of Japan and Europe are similar in that they are both separate hierarchy. They both had hereditary classes of nobles, warriors, and peasants and serfs. Constant warfare in both Japan and Europe made the warrior class the most prominent. In Japan, since the Mongols wanted to attack the Japanese were always prepared and lived in terror. Japanese and Europeans similarly built protective castles. Like in Europe the kings gave land fiefs to vassals, Shoguns distributed land to his followers. In both feudal systems warriors served local lords. spell lords offered payment and protection vassals provided loyalty. Fiefs of land were assumption in return for military avail and therefore knights gained lands from lords as payments for their military service.\r\nAlthough similar to Europe, Japanese feudal system did not pay samurais with land, but instead remunerative them a ratio of the earnings from burdensome the peasants; usually the Daimyo taxed peasants and owned land. As secernate hierarchies, both had a lowest class who were serfs in Europe and peasants in Japan. In both regions, serfs and peasants were heavily taxed and toiled. One conclude for the similarity in stratification was that both Japan and Europe were decentralized. Although Japan and Europe had similarities in their warriors, weaponry, and socio political stratification, the treatment of women vary in each region. Women in Japan were treated more equally; they were able to join the samur ai army and were expected to perform like a samurai and be gruelling like men, even if it meant dying later losing a battle. Unlike the costume of Japan, Europeans cut women as fragile, and delicate who were to be defend by chivalrous men.\r\n'